• Users Online: 88
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

CASE REPORT Table of Contents  
Ahead of print publication
Does a well-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma always behave well? A case series


 I.T.S Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission26-Apr-2022
Date of Decision03-Oct-2022
Date of Acceptance04-Oct-2022
Date of Web Publication01-Dec-2022
 

  Abstract 


Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the sixth most common human cancer and is usually preceded by a premalignant lesion. The patient usually presents it to the clinician at an advanced stage where there are limited treatment options available with declining survival rates. Cancer-deteriorated human lives have prepared the clinicians to take a significant step toward the better survival of patients. Hence, here, we report a case series of oral cancer using some prognostic factors that served in reaching out to conclusion and might favor a diagnostic help to clinicians and pathologists. The final diagnosis for every case was given as well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, yet they all exhibited poor prognostic parameters. Predictive markers of oral carcinoma in clinical, surgical, and histopathological fields contribute to their improved status of living. Such parameters, evaluated here in this case series, might lend a helping hand in determining the patient vulnerability toward poor survival and be provided with best treatment interventions.

Keywords: Invasion, oral squamous cell carcinoma, prognostic markers, survival, tumor invasive front


How to cite this URL:
Raina R, Singhal M, Jain A, Shetty DC. Does a well-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma always behave well? A case series. J Microsc Ultrastruct [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2023 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.jmau.org/preprintarticle.asp?id=362487





  Introduction Top


Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) makes up the bulk of cancers found in oral cavity.[1] It forms the major mortality concern, accounting for 16%–40% of all head-and-neck cancer.[2] Clinically, primary tumor, regional lymph node [LN] metastasis, and distant metastasis (TNM) staging supports the treatment plan and prognosis, lacking biological distinction.[3] Surgery, radiation, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy are the most frequent treatment modalities available.[4] Being a tumor of high invasiveness, metastasis, and poor survival with heterogeneous assemblage at the clinical, biological, and histopathological levels,[2] collective approach is essential.

Histopathological grading systems alone are less constructive for prognosis. For that reason, certain essential aids are put into diagnostic process. These parameters have a potential to predict the patient outcome both at clinical and histopathological levels.

The present case series forms the first of its kind to depict well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas (WDSCCs) with various important prognostic parameters being evaluated in all the three cases which have helped the pathologists and surgeons in viewing the survival status of the patients. None of the studies have analyzed all these predictive factors in WDSCC.


  Case Reports Top


Case 1

A 45-year-old male reported an unhealed ulcer in the left posterior mandibular region for 6 months which was gradually growing with associated pain and burning sensation. Deleterious habits included bidi smoking (8–10 years), smokeless tobacco (4–5 years), and pan and betel nut chewing (2–3 years). Extraorally, diffuse facial swelling was present with solitary enlarged left submandibular LN. Intraorally, an ulceroproliferative growth extended from the left buccal mucosa and vestibule till retromolar trigone [Figure 1]a. Radiological imaging demonstrated soft tissue thickening in the mandibular arch and well-defined hypodense, necrotic area in the center of lesion. Based on clinico-radiological evidence, the provisional diagnosis of malignancy with lower left buccal vestibule, mucosa, and retromolar area was established. Segmented mandibulectomy with partial maxillectomy [Figure 1]b was attempted along with LN (level I–V) excision and followed by pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. In addition, combined chemo- and radiotherapy was recommended. Histopathologically, hematoxylin and eosin (H and E)-stained sections showed surface epithelium infiltrating into underlying fibrocellular connective tissue stroma in the form of nests, islands, cords, and sheets [Figure 1]c. Tumor islands revealed anaplastic features, prominent vesiculated nuclei and nucleoli, pleomorphism, and increased nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio. Individual cell keratinization, large keratin pearls, and atypical mitoses were detected.
Figure 1: Clinical and histopathological characteristics of cases. (a) Case 1 showing red and white ulceroproliferative lesion, (b) Biopsy specimen (segmented mandible and partial maxilla), (c) Tumor cells exhibiting anaplastic features (H and E, ×400), (d) Case 2 showing white keratotic lesion, (e) Tumor proliferation with anaplastic features (H and E, ×100), (f) Case 3 showing reddish ulcerative lesion with whitish-gray plaque-like area, (g) Vital staining, (h) Hyperplastic epithelium with epithelial denudation, and pushing borders (H and E, ×100)

Click here to view
Figure 2: DOI, TT, patterns of invasion, and deeper structures studied for cases. (a) Case 1 showing DOI > TT, (b) Case 2 showing TT > DOI, (c) Case 3 showing DOI > TT, (d) Type 3 and 4 pattern with tumor budding in case 1 (H and E, ×400), (e) Type 2, 3, and 4 invasive patterns in case 2 (H and E, ×100), (f) PNI in Case 1 (H and E, ×400), inset (H and E, ×40), (g) Salivary gland infiltration in Case 1 (H and E, ×400), (h) Muscular involvement in Case 2 (H and E, ×400), (i) ECS of lymph node in Case 1 (H and E, ×100), inset (H and E, ×40), (j) Lymph node invasion in Case 2 (H and E, ×400). TT: Tumor thickness, DOI: Depth of invasion, PNI: Perineural invasion

Click here to view
Figure 3: Inflammatory response and immunohistochemical analysis for cases. (a) Eosinophilic infiltration at TIF in Case 1 (H and E, ×400), (b) Diffuse immune response in Case 3 (H and E, ×400), (c) PCNA (IHC, ×400) labeling in Case 1, inset (IHC, ×40), (d) GLUT-1 (IHC, ×400) immunoexpression in Case 1, inset (IHC, ×40), (e) EGFR (IHC, ×400) expression in Case 2, inset (IHC, ×40), (f) p53 (IHC, ×400) labeling in Case 2, inset (IHC, ×40), (g) PCNA (IHC, ×400) immunoreaction in Case 2, inset (IHC, ×40), (h) VEGF (IHC, ×400) overexpression in case 2, inset (IHC, ×40), (i) p53 (IHC, ×400) labeling in Case 3, inset (IHC, ×40). TIF: Tumor invasive front, PCNA: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen, IHC: Immunohistochemistry, GLUT-1: Glucose transporter 1, EGFR: Epidermal growth factor receptor, VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor

Click here to view


Various parameters were studied histopathologically [Table 1], depth of invasion,[5] tumor thickness (TT),[5] tumor invasiveness[6],[7] and migration in the form of deeper structures involvement, metastases with LN involvement, and inflammatory response. This was followed by immunohistochemical analysis using specific prognostic markers for cellular proliferation or angiogenesis. Finally, histopathological grading (STNMP) was established for rating the patient prognosis. It was done for the other two cases as well. The patient was called in after a week to check the healing and followed up for 1 month. No recurrence was seen at follow-up.
Table 1: Prognostic factors studied in cases

Click here to view


Case 2

A 25-year-old male reported the nonhealing ulcer on the left lateral border of the tongue for the last 1 year [Figure 1]d. Initially, he was asymptomatic but later experienced multiple ulcers gradually increasing in size, painful, associated with burning sensation and dysphagia. Clinical inspection revealed papillary-shaped ulcer with white keratotic rough surface on the left lateral border of the tongue and anterior faucial pillar. It was diffuse, patchy shaped, firm in consistency with ill-defined margins, and tender on palpation. No LN involvement was evident. Clinically, provisional diagnosis was given as carcinoma tongue. Surgical intervention included site of lesion along with neck dissection. H and E-stained section revealed overlying surface epithelium proliferating deep into the underlying connective tissue stroma in the form of tumor islands, cords, sheets, droplets, and nests. Superficial focal ulceration was evident. Bulbous rete ridges with pushing borders were seen [Figure 1]e. Features of anaplasia were evident with several mitotic figures. Underlying connective tissue showed numerous areas of keratin formation with dense inflammatory response and hemorrhagic areas. The parameters were evaluated [Table 1] in this case also, similar to case 1. The patient was followed up for 1 month with no recurrence and uneventful healing.

Case 3

A 64-year-old male reported an ulcer on the right lateral border of the tongue for the past 3–4 months. It was insidious in onset and associated with mild pain on food consumption. Deleterious habits included bidi smoking (2–3 bundles/day, 30–35 years), tobacco chewing (5–6 times/day, 15 years), and alcohol consumption (90 ml/day, 20 years). Extraoral examination revealed palpable, tender, and firm right submandibular LN. Clinical examination revealed a reddish ulcerative lesion with whitish-gray plaque-like area [Figure 1]f, irregularly shaped, circumscribed with rolled out margins, and smooth and nonscrapable texture. Bilateral buccal mucosa blanching with palpable circumoral and vertical bands was appreciated (mouth opening = 34 mm). Vital staining by Toluidine blue highlighted the most dysplastic area [Figure 1]g. Provisional diagnosis of carcinoma tongue was made clinically. Histopathologically, H and E-stained section showed hyperplastic epithelium with chevron-like surface proliferations and broad, bulbous rete ridges. Focal ulcerative area with epithelial denudation was evident [Figure 1]h. Epithelium proliferated into the underlying stroma in the form of long cords, nests, sheets, and strands of tumor cells. Features of anaplasia were seen with numerous keratin pearls and individual cell keratinization. Mitoses were evident. Intense mixed inflammatory reaction was present. The parameters studied here were similar to as stated in case 1 [Table 1] but differing in results. The patient could not be followed up since he left the town.


  Discussion Top


OSCC classically presents tumor differentiation, anaplasia, heterogeneity, polyclonality, and aggressive behavior. Surgical intervention forms the mainstay of the treatment option for OSCC with improvements in patient survival, whereas advanced disease stage along with poor histopathological grading may degrade the overall survival of the patient.[8]

Tumor invasive front (TIF) represents the most progressive part comprising highly active malignant cells impending toward invasion and migration, thus declining the survival. The present case series depicts the tumor activity at TIF in its grave form. Mere histological grading has no effect on prognosis, unless DOI is measured pathologically, stratifying the patients as low-risk and high-risk groups.[9] TT more than 4 mm implicates the worst prognosis.[10] DOI is measured from the adjacent normal basement membrane to the deepest point the tumor invades (millimeters), whereas TT is measured from the highest point of the surface of tumor to the deepest point of the tumor invasion (millimeters).[11] For an exophytic lesion, TT > DOI, whereas for ulcerative lesion, TT < DOI.[12] In the present case series, both Cases 1 and 3 showed DOI > TT. Though Lee et al. gave contradictory statements to their utility in prognosis, wherein TT was not associated with disease specific survival (DSS) or progression free survival (PFS) whereas, increasing DOI was positively associated with decreased DSS and negatively correlated to decreased PFS.[13]

Perivascular invasion (PVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) are correlated to tumor angiogenesis and neovascularization, initiating locoregional or distant metastasis. This corresponds to the microenvironment by-products acting both on host and tumor tissues, as evident through overexpressed vascular endothelial growth factor.[14] The prognostic value of PNI depends on number of foci, size, and location of nerve involved.[15] A study has shown a direct relationship of PNI with different grading and stages of OSCC.[16]

Deeper connective tissue structures, muscle bundles, and adipocyte intrusion correlate to advancing stage cancer and likelihood of occult LN metastasis, thus undetectable clinically. Sialadenotropism was exhibited by salivary glands as neoplastic cell-mediated metaplastic and dysplastic changes. In such a scenario, their inadequate excision ensues recurrences.[17] A study suggested that dysplasia or oral cancer extension from the overlying surface epithelium along the salivary glands and ducts is an uncommon finding. Salivary gland changes must be included in the histopathological interpretations, as their detection decreases the overall morbidity.[18]

Case 1 depicted the involvement of nerves and vessels, whereas muscle bundles were completely obscured in all the three cases.

In addition, tumor cells attacked extracapsular space (ECS) of LN. Though ECS is a rare histopathological phenomenon, yet it embarks its prognostic significance in the patient survival. Cervical LN metastasis is the most significant, consistent, and independent prognostic factor, severing the survival rate by 50%. Although it passively identifies the tumor–host interaction, no confirmed prognostic literature evidence is present.[19] As per the literature, the number of positive lymph node systems has been regarded superior to the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer neck lymph node classification. It provided a reliable method to instruct adjuvant treatment and a better tool for doctor-to-patient communication.[20] Cases 1 and 2 both showed lymph node involvement with ECS presented by Case 1.

Hanahan and Weinberg[21] mentioned tumor inflammatory microenvironment as the seventh hallmark of cancer contributing toward survival and proliferation of neoplastic cells, angiogenesis, metastasis, altered immunity, and decreased chemotherapeutic response, inducing genetic aberrancy in malignant cells. OSCC is characterized by abundance of varying immune cells. Increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) corroborate better prognosis and are entailed as an independent marker of recurrence.[22] Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) correlates with tumor differentiation and nodal metastasis.[23] A study verified indirect link between TATE count and grade of invasion, emphasizing its defensive role in neoplastic cytotoxicity and progression.[12] Here, the cases reported the presence of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells. A study found increased eosinophils in carcinoma and suggested that eosinophilic infiltration in dysplastic lesions should be looked into for invasiveness.[24] TILs in oral cancer have an impact on tumor biology and behavior, therapeutic response, and patient survival.[25]

TIF embarks a higher degree of cell dissociation, lower differentiation, and distinctive molecular profile than superficial areas, making it the most prognostic area of the tumor. The genomic shift at the TIF predicts the tumor biology with possible local recurrence and metastasis.[26] Tumor markers predict the recurrences and are found in higher quantities in cancerous tissue.[27] Proliferative markers aid in determining the cell proliferation velocity in tumors.[28] An increased proliferative activity correlates to deteriorated state and prognosis, equivalent to the present results, depicted through overexpressed p53, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, glucose transporter 1, and epidermal growth factor receptor.

Although the present cases were diagnosed as WDSCC, they all exhibited the poor prognostic parameters. Therefore, the patients were considered having poor phenotype with poor survival. Such cases demonstrate recurrent lesional episodes with anticancer therapy resistance. Various WDSCC case reports are summarized in [Table 2] with their concluding results. This restricted case series of WDSCC highlights various parameters that can be evaluated histopathologically in order to attain the survival status of the patients. This shows that even with the diagnosis of WDSCC, the patient may have worse prognosis.
Table 2: Well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas diagnosed by various investigators with their prognostic implications

Click here to view


Limitations

The follow-up of the patients could not be done for more than 1 month. Furthermore, viral infectivity (human papillomavirus), which is regarded as an etiological agent in OSCC, was not detected, which might have added as an additional prognostic factor.


  Conclusion Top


Understanding the exact tumor biology is important. A clarified molecular mechanism behind OSCC is crucial for early detection, treatment, and prognosis.

The present research and available data recommend STNMP, DOI, and others to be the dependable core prognosticators of OSCC. Despite therapeutic advances, OSCC maintains a challenging image in the field of malignancies; hence, implementing such histopathological prognosticators in diagnosis is a requisite for a conclusive future.[39]

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Harada H, Tomioka H, Hirai H, Kuroshima T, Oikawa Y, Nojima H, et al. MRI before biopsy correlates with depth of invasion corrected for shrinkage rate of the histopathological specimen in tongue carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021;11:20992.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Barrett JC. Mechanisms of multistep carcinogenesis and carcinogen risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 1993;100:9-20.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Doshi NP, Shah SA, Patel KB, Jhabuawala MF. Histological grading of oral cancer: A comparison of different systems and their relation to lymph node metastasis. Natl J Community Med 2011;2:136-42.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Li G, Wang X, Li C, Hu S, Niu Z, Sun Q, et al. Piwi-interacting RNA1037 enhances chemoresistance and motility in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Onco Targets Ther 2019;12:10615-27.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O'Sullivan B, Brandwein MS, Ridge JA, Migliacci JC, et al. Head and Neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:122-37.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bryne M. Is the invasive front of an oral carcinoma the most important area for prognostication? Oral Dis 1998;4:70-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Hasegawa K, Kayano T. Early invasion of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: Pathology of 31 cases. J Oral Pathol 1988;17:49-54.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Boonpoapichart S, Punyavong P, Jenwitheesuk K, Surakunprapha P, Winaikosol K. Significant prognostic factors influencing the survival difference of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3889.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ghazi N, Ghazi A, Shafiee S, Fayyazi M. Importance of depth of invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A review article. J Orofac Sci 2018;10:3-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
  [Full text]  
10.
O'Brien CJ, Lauer CS, Fredricks S, Clifford AR, McNeil EB, Bagia JS, et al. Tumor thickness influences prognosis of T1 and T2 oral cavity cancer-but what thickness? Head Neck 2003;25:937-45.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Liu B, Amaratunga R, Veness M, Wong E, Abdul-Razak M, Coleman H, et al. Tumor depth of invasion versus tumor thickness in guiding regional nodal treatment in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020;129:45-50.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Majumdar B, Anil S, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, Rao RS, Patil S. Tumor associated tissue eosinophilia as a potential predictor in the invasion patterns of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Int Oral Health 2016;8:1026-30.  Back to cited text no. 12
  [Full text]  
13.
Lee YJ, Kwon TG, Kim JW, Lee ST, Hong SH, Choi SY. Evaluation of depth of invasion and tumor thickness as a prognostic factor for early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;12:20.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1011-27.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Chinn SB, Spector ME, Bellile EL, McHugh JB, Gernon TJ, Bradford CR, et al. Impact of perineural invasion in the pathologically N0 neck in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;149:893-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Deepthi G, Shyam ND, Kumar GK, Narayen V, Paremala K, Preethi P. Characterization of perineural invasion in different histological grades and variants of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2020;24:57-63.  Back to cited text no. 16
  [Full text]  
17.
Mohan SP, Chitturi RT, Ragunathan YT, Lakshmi SJ, Nallusamy J, Joseph I. Minor salivary gland changes in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma – A histopathological study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC12-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Genden EM, Ferlito A, Silver CE, Takes RP, Suárez C, Owen RP, et al. Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:1001-17.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kapoor C, Vaidya S, Wadhwan V, Malik S. Lymph node metastasis: A bearing on prognosis in squamous cell carcinoma. Indian J Cancer 2015;52:417-24.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
20.
Li P, Fang Q, Yang Y, Chen D, Du W, Liu F, et al. Survival significance of number of positive lymph nodes in oral squamous cell carcinoma stratified by p16. Front Oncol 2021;11:545433.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Xu Q, Wang C, Yuan X, Feng Z, Han Z. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Transl Oncol 2017;10:10-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Oliveira DT, Biassi TP, Faustino SE, Carvalho AL, Landman G, Kowalski LP. Eosinophils may predict occult lymph node metastasis in early oral cancer. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1523-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Shrestha P, Narayan K, Kumar VK, Hemdala GC, Murgod S. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia in oral squamous cell carcinoma – A predictable biological behavior. J Global Oral Health 2020;3:3-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Spector ME, Bellile E, Amlani L, Zarins K, Smith J, Brenner JC, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;145:1012-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Cortegoso AV, Laureano NK, Silva AD, Danilevicz CK, Magnusson AS, Visioli F, et al. Cell proliferation markers at the invasive tumor front of oral squamous cell carcinoma: Comparative analysis in relation to clinicopathological parameters of patients. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25:318-23.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Rajguru JP, Mouneshkumar CD, Radhakrishnan IC, Negi BS, Maya D, Hajibabaei S, et al. Tumor markers in oral cancer: A review. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:492-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
  [Full text]  
28.
Siriwardena BS, Karunathilaka HD, Kumarasiri PV, Tilakaratne WM. Impact of histological and molecular parameters on prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of 290 cases. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:2059240.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Horie N, Shimoyama T, Kaneko T, Ide F. Multiple oral squamous cell carcinomas with blood and tissue eosinophilia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1648-50.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Akbulut N, Oztas B, Kursun S, Evirgen S. Delayed diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A case series. J Med Case Rep 2011;5:291.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Sheikh S, D'souza J. A case of well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma in an extraction socket. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2012;16:602-5.  Back to cited text no. 31
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
32.
Bijai LK, Mathew P, Jayaraman V, Austin RD. Oral squamous cell carcinoma of palate – A case report and review of literature. Int J Dent Sci Res 2014;2:106-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Kayal L, Jayachandran S, Bhaskar YH. Squamous cell carcinoma of tongue – A case report and review of literature. Int J Curr Res Rev 2016;8:64-7.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Pramanick D, Ghose S. Synchronous multiple oral squamous cell carcinoma in a female patient: A case report and review. Indian J Case Rep 2017;4:28-30.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Riju J, Thomas S, Rajan R. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Mandible in a 10-year-old girl. Int J Head Neck Surg 2017;8:150-52.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Sirisha V. A well differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma involving the lateral border of tongue – A unique case report. Int Dent J Stud Res 2019;7:121-4.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Tantray S, Chauhan K. Oral squamous cell carcinoma in 38-year-old male: A case report. J Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020;6:92-7.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Abhyankar V, Ferrence S, Shahrabi-Farahani S, Mascerenhas J, Luepke P, Anderson KM. Biopsy technique and histopathological diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue – A case report. J Dent Oral Biol 2020;5:1161.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Suga T, Tu TT, Takenoshita M, Mikuzuki L, Umezaki Y, Shimamoto H, et al. Case report: Hidden oral squamous cell carcinoma in oral somatic symptom disorder. Front Psychiatry 2021;12:651871.  Back to cited text no. 39
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Reema Raina,
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, I.T.S Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jmau.jmau_35_22



    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
   Ahead Of Print
  
 Article in PDF
     Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Raina R
    -  Singhal M
    -  Jain A
    -  Shetty DC


Abstract
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed171    
    PDF Downloaded10    

Recommend this journal